Can your roster be too deep?

Bear with me here, but have you ever looked at an nba roster before the season starts and thought, "Wow, now there's a strong lookin team," only to be disappointed? Have you noticed that sometimes teams just don't click? Well if not, then you clearly haven't been paying attention to this season, because there's several strong examples of teams that just have/had trouble getting it together. 

1. Cleveland Cavaliers-

Three starting caliber centers,  a back court that can score at will, a highly underrated power forward in Tristan Thompson, and a badass sixth man and veteran in Jarrett Jack, how could this not work out!? Good question! Cleveland went into the season with, what looked like, one of the fastest "up and coming" rosters in the NBA, but somehow they failed to make it work both on and off the court. 

2. Detroit Pistons-

Now you may be thinking to yourself, "I don't know if I'd call this team especially deep," but think about it for a sec. This team has two future franchise players in Greg Monroe and Andre Drummond. Greg is an offensive beast on the block with a healthy shooting range and not too shabby rebounding numbers. Andre is an athletic freak of nature who defends and rebounds at a ridiculous level, and he's still got a lot of room to grow. On top of these two players you have an offensively gifted point guard in Jennings, an All-Star snub in Josh Smith, a strong two-way player in Kyle Singler, and several legitimate role players after that. BUT despite this ridiculous amount of talent, the Pistons are barely treading water, and even though their rebounding numbers are high, that's about all they have to be proud of in this joke of a season. Poor Chauncey must be regretting coming back. 

3. Brooklyn Nets-

The Brooklyn Nets have been the best team since the turn of the new year so you can definitely argue that they don't belong on this list, however I list them because they just never really fulfilled the expectations of the fans. Brooklyn was ready to have Billy Kings head after the first part of the season. Deron Williams has had trouble with consistency, Garnett didn't look comfortable for the majority of the season, Joe Johnson only showed up about 50% of the time, and Jason Kidd was too busy cleaning up spilled soda to really know what to do at first. Again the Nets are heading into the playoffs strong and they may even be an upset team, but personally, I kinda was hoping they'd be a legitimate contender from start to finish.

Look at all three of these teams and tell me they haven't been disappointing this season. These deep rosters that were supposed to be capable of playoff runs and future franchise players just never really picked up the projected speed they were supposed to. Here's a couple theories why:

A) With such deep rosters, you find that allocating the minutes to keep everyone happy takes away from the effectiveness of the team. The starters are subbed out so quickly that no one has a real chance to get in their "groove." 

B) Too many competing personalities. . This seems to be the most popular theory as to why deep teams don't always pan out, just look at the Pacers. Indiana gave away virtually nothing and got strong depth at center, and a MIP of the year candidate in Evan Turner, yet since the trade they have just plain awful. This seems to be due to the teams contrasting personalities and play styles, simply translated, Bynum is a cancer to his team and Turner is a ball hog. Josh Smith is a perfect example of this as well. One of the most selfish players in the league, Smith chooses to shoot threes and make stupid plays instead of playing to his strengths and truly helping his team. His personality is one of the reasons this team isn't succeeding.

C) Finally the one thing that all these teams had in common were inconsistency at the coaching position. Mike Brown is a joke, sorry but it's true, Lebron is the only reason Brown even has a career and hiring him back was purely a political move to bring King James back. Maurice Cheeks was fired for his ineffectiveness, and frankly, inability to keep Josh Smith under control. Finally Jason Kidd; even though he has really seemed to step up lately, I can't help but wonder if he's still a bit over his head, and this winning streak isn't simply his veterans taking charge. 

The point being that deeper is always better. Sometimes you need to have that nobody bench warmer with a chip on his shoulder on your roster to add a more humble and team oriented dynamic to the atmosphere. If you have a bunch of guys who don't feel they need to prove anything then you really don't have much at all do you?